Creation of a CF-specific antibiotic spectrum index (ASI) as an antimicrobial stewardship initiative.

Antibiotics are frequently utilized for cystic fibrosis (CF)-related pulmonary exacerbation treatment. The antibiotic spectrum index (ASI) is an antimicrobial stewardship tool developed to compare the relative breadth of individual antibiotics. This study aimed to create two expanded CF-specific ASI scoring indices for use in antimicrobial stewardship research and clinical care. The first scoring index expanded the original ASI to include bacterial microorganisms common to CF airway infections (CF-ASI). The second scoring system only included scores for bacterial microorganisms classically identified in CF airway infections (CF-sASI). Sixty-two antibiotics were evaluated and included in the updated ASIs. When multiple antibiotics are prescribed, we proposed using an additive ASI approach whereby the sum of the individual prescribed antibiotic scores represents the total ASI score. The application of CF-focused ASIs into CF research and stewardship programs can help to optimize antibiotic benefits, minimize harms and allow for increased sustainability of antibiotic use in CF.

Prevalence and Clinical Impact of Respiratory Viral Infections from the STOP2 Study of Cystic Fibrosis Pulmonary Exacerbations.

Rationale: Rates of viral respiratory infection (VRI) are similar in people with cystic fibrosis (CF) and the general population; however, the associations between VRI and CF pulmonary exacerbations (PEx) require further elucidation.Objectives: To determine VRI prevalence during CF PEx and evaluate associations between VRI, clinical presentation, and treatment response.Methods: The STOP2 (Standardized Treatment of Pulmonary Exacerbations II) study was a multicenter randomized trial to evaluate different durations of intravenous antibiotic therapy for PEx. In this ancillary study, participant sputum samples from up to three study visits were tested for respiratory viruses using multiplex polymerase chain reactions. Baselines and treatment-associated changes in mean lung function (percent predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 s), respiratory symptoms (Chronic Respiratory Infection Symptom Score), weight, and C-reactive protein were compared as a function of virus detection. Odds of PEx retreatment within 30 days and future PEx hazard were modeled by logistic and Cox proportional hazards regression, respectively.Results: A total of 1,254 sputum samples from 621 study participants were analyzed. One or more respiratory viruses were detected in sputum samples from 245 participants (39.5%). Virus-positive participants were more likely to be receiving CF transmembrane conductance regulator modulator therapy (45% vs. 34%) and/or chronic azithromycin therapy (54% vs. 44%) and more likely to have received treatment for nontuberculous Mycobacterium infection in the preceding 2 years (7% vs. 3%). At study visit 1, virus-positive participants were more symptomatic (mean Chronic Respiratory Infection Symptom Score, 53.8 vs. 51.1), had evidence of greater systemic inflammation (log10 C-reactive protein concentration, 1.32 log10 mg/L vs. 1.23 log10 mg/L), and had a greater drop in percent predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second from the prior 6-month baseline (5.8 vs. 3.6). Virus positivity was associated with reduced risk of future PEx (hazard ratio, 0.82; 95% confidence interval, 0.69-0.99; P = 0.034) and longer median time to next PEx (255 d vs. 172 d; P = 0.021) compared with virus negativity.Conclusions: More than one-third of STOP2 participants treated for a PEx had a positive test result for a respiratory virus with more symptomatic initial presentation compared with virus-negative participants, but favorable long-term outcomes. More refined phenotyping of PEx, taking VRIs into account, may aid in optimizing personalized management of PEx.Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02781610).

Adjunctive Systemic Corticosteroids for Pulmonary Exacerbations of Cystic Fibrosis.

RATIONALE: Pulmonary exacerbations (PEx) remain the most common cause of morbidity, recurrent hospitalization and diminished survival in people with CF (PWCF), and are characterized by excess inflammation. Corticosteroids are potent, widely available anti-inflammatory drugs. However, corticosteroid efficacy data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in PWCF are limited. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether adjunctive systemic corticosteroid therapy is associated with improved outcomes in acute CF PEx. METHODS: We performed a secondary analysis of STOP2, a large multicenter RCT of antimicrobial treatment durations for adult PWCF presenting with PEx, that included the use of corticosteroids as a stratification criterion in its randomization protocol. Corticosteroid treatment effects were determined after propensity score-matching for covariates including age, sex, baseline FEV1, genotype and randomization arm. The primary outcome measure was the change in percent predicted FEV1 (ppFEV1). Symptoms, time to next PEx and the incidence of adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were assessed as secondary endpoints. Phenotypic factors associated with the clinical decision to prescribe steroids were also investigated. RESULTS: Corticosteroids were prescribed for 168 of 982 PEx events in STOP2 (17%). Steroid prescription was associated with decreased baseline ppFEV1, increased age, and female sex. Co-treatment with corticosteroids was independent of treatment arm allocation, and did not result in greater mean ppFEV1 response, longer median time to next PEx or more substantial symptomatic improvement compared to propensity-matched PWCF receiving antibiotics alone. AEs were not increased in corticosteroid-treated PWCF. The total number of SAEs - but not the number of corticosteroid-related or PEx-ralated SAEs - was higher among patients receiving corticosteroids. CONCLUSION: Empiric, physician-directed treatment with systemic corticosteroids, while common, is not associated with improved clinical outcomes in PWCF receiving antibiotics for PEx.

Impact of lumacaftor/ivacaftor and tezacaftor/ivacaftor on treatment response in pulmonary exacerbations of F508del/F508del cystic fibrosis.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary exacerbations (PEx) remain a major cause of morbidity and mortality in people with cystic fibrosis (PWCF). Although the combination cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulators lumacaftor/ivacaftor and tezacaftor/ivacaftor have been shown to reduce PEx frequency, their influence on clinical and biochemical responses to acute PEx treatment is unknown. METHODS: We performed a secondary analysis of STOP2, a large multicenter randomized controlled trial of antimicrobial treatment durations for adult PWCF presenting with PEx. Propensity score matching was used to compare outcomes in antibiotic-treated F508del/F508del PWCF receiving lumacaftor/ivacaftor or tezacaftor/ivacaftor with those observed in antibiotic-treated F508del/F508del controls not receiving CFTR modulator therapy. The primary outcome measure was the change in percent predicted FEV1 (ppFEV1) following completion of intravenous (IV) antibiotics, with post-antibiotic changes in symptoms, serum C-reactive protein (CRP) concentrations and weight included as secondary endpoints. RESULTS: Among 982 PEx events in randomized PWCF, 480 were homozygous for F508del, of whom 289 were receiving lumacaftor/ivacaftor or tezacaftor/ivacaftor at initiation of antibiotic therapy. Modulator-treated F508del/F508del PWCF did not demonstrate greater improvements in ppFEV1, symptoms, serum CRP or weight following antibiotic treatment compared to modulator-naïve controls matched for age, sex, baseline ppFEV1, genotype, body mass index, initial CRP, initial symptoms, exacerbation history, diabetic status, randomization arm and concomitant medical therapy. CONCLUSION: In the acute setting, CFTR modulator therapy with lumacaftor/ivacaftor or tezacaftor/ivacaftor does not convey additional clinical or biochemical advantage above standardized PEx treatment in F508del/F508del PWCF.

Re-examining baseline lung function recovery following IV-treated pulmonary exacerbations.

CF registry pulmonary exacerbation (PEx) analyses have employed "before and after" spirometry recovery, where the best percent predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 s (ppFEV1) prior to PEx ("baseline") is compared to the best ppFEV1 <3 months post-PEx. This methodology lacks comparators and ascribes recovery failure to PEx. Herein, we describe 2014 CF Foundation Patient Registry PEx analyses including a comparator: recovery around nonPEx events, birthdays. 49.6% of 7357 individuals with PEx achieved baseline ppFEV1 recovery while 36.6% of 14,141 achieved baseline recovery after birthdays; individuals with both PEx and birthdays were more likely to recover baseline after PEx than after birthdays (47% versus 34%); mean ppFEV1 declines were 0.3 (SD=9.3) and 3.1 (9.3), respectively. Post-event measure number had more effect on baseline recovery than did real ppFEV1 loss in simulations, suggesting that PEx recovery analyses lacking comparators are prone to artifact and poorly describe PEx contributions to disease progression.

The Elusive Role of Airway Infection in Cystic Fibrosis Exacerbation.

Cystic fibrosis (CF) pulmonary exacerbations (PEx) are clinical events that commonly result in increased treatment burden, decreased quality of life, and accelerated lung disease progression. CF PEx have historically been approached as though dealing with acute infections, and antibiotic treatments have been associated with improved outcomes. In this review, we discuss data supporting a causal role of CF airway infection in PEx as well studies that highlight our knowledge gaps in regard to PEx definitions, pathophysiology, and optimal treatment approaches. In the era of highly effective cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator modulator therapy, and the continually increasing health and longevity of persons with CF, a better understanding of PEx and further optimization of PEx antibiotic treatment approaches are needed.

Changes in airway bacterial communities occur soon after initiation of antibiotic treatment of pulmonary exacerbations in cystic fibrosis.

Chronic polymicrobial airway infections are a hallmark of cystic fibrosis (CF) lung disease. Antibiotic therapy is a primary treatment of CF pulmonary exacerbations (PEx); however, the impact of episodic antibiotic treatment on airway bacterial communities has not been well described. We analyzed sputum samples from adults with CF obtained immediately before and during antibiotic treatment of PEx. Sequencing of the V4 region of the bacterial 16S ribosomal RNA gene was used to assess changes in bacterial community structure during antibiotic treatment. The peak impact of antibiotic treatment was observed by day four or five of treatment. These findings advance our understanding of bacterial community dynamics during antibiotic treatment of PEx and complement recent and ongoing studies evaluating the optimal duration of antibiotic therapy for PEx.

Health care costs in a randomized trial of antimicrobial duration among cystic fibrosis patients with pulmonary exacerbations.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of these analyses was to determine whether overall costs were reduced in cystic fibrosis (CF) patients experiencing pulmonary exacerbation (PEx) who received shorter versus longer durations of treatment. METHODS: Among people with CF experiencing PEx, we calculated 30-day inpatient, outpatient, emergency room, and medication costs and summed these to derive total costs in 2020 USD. Using the Kaplan-Meier sample average (KMSA) method, we calculated adjusted costs and differences in costs within two pairs of randomized groups: early robust responders (ERR) randomized to receive treatment for 10 days (ERR-10 days) or 14 days (ERR-14 days), and non-early robust responders (NERR) randomized to receive treatment for 14 days (NERR-14 days) or 21 days (NERR-21 days). RESULTS: Patients in the shorter treatment duration groups had shorter lengths of stay per hospitalization (mean ± standard deviation (SD) for ERR-10 days: 7.9 ± 3.0 days per hospitalization compared to 10.1 ± 4.2 days in ERR-14 days; for NERR-14 days: 8.7 ± 4.9 days per hospitalization compared to 9.6 ± 6.5 days in NERR-21 days). We found statistically significantly lower adjusted mean costs (95% confidence interval) among those who were randomized to receive shorter treatment durations (ERR-10 days: $60,800 ($59,150 - $62,430) vs $74,420 ($72,610 - $76,450) in ERR-14 days; NERR-14 days: $66,690 ($65,960-$67,400) versus $74,830 ($73,980-$75,650) in NERR-21 days). CONCLUSIONS: Tied with earlier evidence that shorter treatment duration was not associated with worse clinical outcomes, our analyses indicate that treating with shorter antimicrobial durations can reduce costs without diminishing clinical outcomes.

A Randomized Clinical Trial of Antimicrobial Duration for Cystic Fibrosis Pulmonary Exacerbation Treatment.

Rationale: People with cystic fibrosis (CF) experience acute worsening of respiratory symptoms and lung function known as pulmonary exacerbations. Treatment with intravenous antimicrobials is common; however, there is scant evidence to support a standard treatment duration. Objectives: To test differing durations of intravenous antimicrobials for CF exacerbations. Methods: STOP2 (Standardized Treatment of Pulmonary Exacerbations 2) was a multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trial in exacerbations among adults with CF. After 7-10 days of treatment, participants exhibiting predefined lung function and symptom improvements were randomized to 10 or 14 days' total antimicrobial duration; all others were randomized to 14 or 21 days' duration. Measurements and Main Results: The primary outcome was percent predicted FEV1 (ppFEV1) change from treatment initiation to 2 weeks after cessation. Among early responders, noninferiority of 10 days to 14 days was tested; superiority of 21 days compared with 14 days was compared for the others. Symptoms, weight, and adverse events were secondary. Among 982 randomized people, 277 met improvement criteria and were randomized to 10 or 14 days of treatment; the remaining 705 received 21 or 14 days of treatment. Mean ppFEV1 change was 12.8 and 13.4 for 10 and 14 days, respectively, a ‒0.65 difference (95% CI [‒3.3 to 2.0]), excluding the predefined noninferiority margin. The 21- and 14-day arms experienced 3.3 and 3.4 mean ppFEV1 changes, a difference of ‒0.10 (‒1.3 to 1.1). Secondary endpoints and sensitivity analyses were supportive. Conclusions: Among adults with CF with early treatment improvement during exacerbation, ppFEV1 after 10 days of intravenous antimicrobials is not inferior to 14 days. For those with less improvement after one week, 21 days is not superior to 14 days. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02781610).

Measuring the impact of CFTR modulation on sweat chloride in cystic fibrosis: Rationale and design of the CHEC-SC study.

BACKGROUND: The Characterizing CFTR Modulated Changes in Sweat Chloride and their Association with Clinical Outcomes (CHEC-SC) study is a large epidemiologic study designed to determine the relationship between sweat chloride response and clinical outcomes in people with cystic fibrosis (CF) on commercially approved CFTR modulators. A challenge to study feasibility was capturing sweat chloride measurements before modulator initiation. We tested the hypothesis that historic sweat chloride approximated contemporary pre-modulator values to estimate CFTR modulator-induced changes, allowing a single-visit study design. METHODS: GOAL and PROSPECT were multi-center prospective studies of individuals initiating ivacaftor or lumacaftor-ivacaftor. At enrollment, pre-modulator sweat chloride was measured and historic results recorded. Post-modulator sweat chloride was measured at 1, 3 and 6 months. For this analysis, differences between historic and pre-modulator sweat chloride were estimated. CFTR modulator-induced sweat chloride mean changes were compared using historic and pre-modulator sweat chloride. RESULTS: Paired historic and pre-modulator sweat chloride (n=406 participants) revealed a non-significant mean change of -1.0 mmol/L (95% CI: -2.71, 0.66) over an average of 17.2 years. Calculating sweat response to ivacaftor or lumacaftor-ivacaftor using historic or pre-modulator values resulted in similar estimates of modulator response. Based on these results, the CHEC-SC study was designed with a single, post-modulator sweat chloride measurement. CONCLUSIONS: Historic sweat chloride values provide a reliable estimate of pre-modulator sweat chloride for people starting on modulator therapy. The CHEC-SC study anticipates capturing approximately 5,000 sweat chloride values, providing an unprecedented understanding of sweat chloride across the CF population in the era of CFTR modulators.

Epidemiologic Study of Cystic Fibrosis: 25 years of observational research.

The Epidemiologic Study of Cystic Fibrosis (ESCF) was a prospective observational study of over 32,000 people with cystic fibrosis (CF) from 250 clinical care sites in North America from 1994 to 2005. Begun as a pharmacovigilance study in connection with the approval of dornase alfa in 1993, ESCF was open to all people with CF treated at any participating site in the United States or Canada. In addition to obtaining safety and effectiveness data on dornase alfa, ESCF collected encounter-based data to characterize the natural history and management of CF with a special focus on lung disease. During the study, 32,178 patients reported at least one encounter, contributing 869,136 encounters, 622,592 pulmonary function tests, 432,896 cultures, and 118,563 pulmonary exacerbations treated with intravenous antibiotics. Although ESCF data collection concluded in 2005, through a collaboration with the U.S. Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Patient Registry, additional follow-up data through 2017 was available for two-thirds of patients. This allowed for updating of CF genotype and survival information. Fifty-six peer-reviewed publications (cited over 3600 times) resulted from this study. In this manuscript we summarize the published ESCF manuscripts in thematic groups with key study findings and brief comments, and speculate on how ESCF findings will inform future data registries and patient care practices.

Antimicrobial resistance: Concerns of healthcare providers and people with CF.

BACKGROUND: Chronic lung infections and their treatment pose risks for the development of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in people with cystic fibrosis (PWCF). In this study, we evaluated the attitudes of healthcare providers' (HCP) and PWCF or their parents' toward AMR within the international CF community. METHODS: HCP and PWCF identified through listservs and CF-related organizations were asked to complete an AMR centered survey, with additional questions on antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) for HCP. Descriptive analyses are reported. RESULTS: The responding 443 HCP and 464 PWCF/Parents were from 30 and 25 countries, respectively. Sixty-two percent of HCP and 56% of PWCF stated they were "very concerned" about AMR, with Pseudomonas spp. and Burkholderia spp. considered the most concerning organisms for both HCP and PWCF/Parents. Non-tuberculous mycobacteria were of greater concern to HCP compared to PWCF/Parents. There was a discrepancy regarding AMR education to PWCF, with 80% of HCP stating having discussed this with PWCF/Parents, but only 50% of PWCF recalling such discussions. CONCLUSION: These results highlight that AMR is relevant to CF HCP and PWCF internationally, indicating that educational tools and research are warranted.

Evaluating assumptions of definition-based pulmonary exacerbation endpoints in cystic fibrosis clinical trials.

BACKGROUND: Cystic fibrosis (CF) pulmonary exacerbations can be serious respiratory events and reduction in exacerbation rate or risk are important efficacy endpoints for CF therapeutic trials. Variability in exacerbation diagnoses and treatment have led drug developers to employ "objective" exacerbation definitions combining antimicrobial treatment (AT) and the presence of ≥4 of 12 respiratory criteria (first published by Fuchs et al. [NEJM 1994;331(10):637-42]). Assumptions underlying this approach have yet to be formally evaluated. METHODS: Respiratory events (RE) observed during a 48-week trial of ataluren (NCT02139306), a read-through agent for premature nonsense codons, were compared across six exacerbation definitions: any AT, intravenous AT (IVAT), ≥4 Fuchs criteria present, AT plus ≥4 Fuchs criteria, IVAT plus ≥4 Fuchs criteria, and investigator assessment. Fuchs definitions were evaluated by assessing missingness of individual criteria and associations between criteria presence and clinician exacerbation assessment. RESULTS: Among 751 RE, more than one third had ≥4 Fuchs criteria present but were not assessed as exacerbations by investigators. Data for ≥1 and for 4 Fuchs criteria, respectively, were missing for ~ 90% and >30% of RE. Only 6/12 Fuchs criteria were present more often when investigators assessed RE as exacerbations than when they did not. CONCLUSIONS: "Objective" definitions have shortcomings inconsistent with their purpose of optimizing exacerbation capture in clinical trials : 1) they capture events clinicians do not consider exacerbations, 2) are prone to data missingness which can bias the likelihood of meeting the definition, and 3) employ criteria that are not associated with investigator assessment of exacerbation.

Pseudomonas aeruginosa antimicrobial susceptibility test (AST) results and pulmonary exacerbation treatment responses in cystic fibrosis.

Background Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) of bacterial isolates is a time- and resource-intensive procedure recommended by cystic fibrosis (CF) treatment guidelines for antimicrobial selection for pulmonary exacerbation (PEx) treatment. Methods We studied relationships between Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Pa) isolate AST results, antipseudomonal PEx treatments, and treatment responses as change in weight and percent predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 s (ppFEV1) as well as future antimicrobial treatment hazard for PEx occurring at a CF care center from 1999 through 2018. Treatments were categorized by "Pa coverage" as complete (all Pa isolates susceptible by AST to at least one administered agent), none (no isolates susceptible), incomplete (some, but not all isolates susceptible), and indeterminant (administered antipseudomonals not evaluated by AST). Weight and ppFEV1 responses were compared across Pa coverage categories using unadjusted and adjusted general estimating equations; hazard of future treatment was assessed by Cox and logistic regression. Results Among 3820 antimicrobial PEx treatment events in 413 patients with Pa, 62.6% (2390) had complete Pa coverage; 8.9% (340), 2.4% (99), and 26.2% (1000), had no, incomplete, and indeterminant Pa coverage, respectively. Mean baseline to follow-up weight change was +0.74 kg [95% CI 0.63, 0.86]; ppFEV1 change was +1.60 [1.29, 1.90]. Pa coverage category was not associated with significant differences in weight or ppFEV1 change or with future antimicrobial treatment hazard. Conclusions We did not observe superior responses for AST-defined complete Pa coverage treatments versus lesser coverage treatments, suggesting that AST may be of little utility in choosing antimicrobials for CF PEx treatment.

Association of Inhaled Antibiotics in Addition to Standard Intravenous Therapy and Outcomes of Pediatric Inpatient Pulmonary Exacerbations.

Rationale: Considerable morbidity and disease progression in people with cystic fibrosis (CF) result from pulmonary exacerbations (PExs). PEx guidelines note insufficient evidence to recommend for or against the concomitant use of inhaled and intravenous antibiotics.Objectives: We hypothesize that the addition of inhaled antibiotics for PEx therapy is associated with improvements in lung function and a longer time to next PEx compared with standard intravenous antibiotics alone.Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study using the CF Foundation Patient Registry-Pediatric Health Information System linked dataset. People with CF were included if they were hospitalized for PEx between 2006 and 2016 and 6 to 21 years of age. Lung function outcomes were assessed by linear mixed effect modeling and generalized estimating equations. The time to next PEx was assessed by Cox proportional hazards regression. To estimate independent causal effects while accounting for indication bias and other confounders, inverse probabilities of treatment weights were calculated based on covariates believed to influence the likelihood of inhaled antibiotic use during PEx treatment.Results: A total of 3,253 children and adolescents contributed 9,040 PEx events for analysis. Inhaled antibiotics were used in 23% of PEx events but were not associated with better pre- to post-PEx percent predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second responses (mean difference, -1.11%; 95% confidence interval [CI], -1.83 to -0.38; P = 0.003), higher odds of returning to lung function baseline (odds ratio, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.82 to 1.07; P = 0.34), or longer time to next PEx (hazard ratio, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.99 to 1.12; P = 0.098).Conclusions: The addition of inhaled antibiotics to standard intravenous antibiotic PEx treatment was not associated with improved lung function outcomes or a longer time to next PEx.

Finding the relevance of antimicrobial stewardship for cystic fibrosis.

Antimicrobials have undoubtedly improved the lives of people with CF, but important antimicrobial-related toxicities and the emergence of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria associated with their use must be considered. Antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) is advocated across the spectrum of healthcare to promote the appropriate use of antimicrobials to preserve their current effectiveness and to optimise treatment, and it is clear that AMS strategies are applicable to and can benefit both non-CF and CF populations. This perspective explores the definition and components of an AMS program, the current evidence for AMS, and the reasons why AMS is a challenging concept in the provision of CF care. We also discuss the elements of CF care which align with AMS programs and principles and propose research priorities for AMS in CF.